Outlaws

In view of the collapse of our (Western) civilisation, and possibly of civilisation generally, imminent, or at least with the threat of the imposition of a feudality under the auspices of transhumanism, the time has come to call in question long-held principles. These include the monopoly of force of the state.

Once the rule of law has been discredited, as it has been, by corrupt or spineless judges, prosecutors, heads of police and the like; with the suppression of juries and concealment of their right to annulment; with universal censorship of even the mildest of evidence-based reasoning; there is a need to set out how a fight-back might proceed.

One of several domains of masculinity (manliness) is cultivation of the ability to use measured force, i.e. only as much as is necessary. This presupposes the discernment to see when action is indeed imperative. Not all men are called for this, but some must be.

Since in most jurisdictions, the judiciary has abdicated or indeed sided with Evil, no recourse is left but for those able and positioned to do so to take action. A handful of people must know personally the perpetrators, for example, the members of medical councils who have expelled and persecuted honourable doctors for following the Hippocratic Oath. Why are these people still alive and kicking?

Another cohort qualifying as outlaws are pilots whose sole task is to pollute the skies.

Judges who agree to the principle of deselection by universal suffrage must be afforded the protections of the Common Law. Not so those who fail to affirm this principle, or an equivalent or sound alternative.

An outlaw is no longer protected by the common law of courtesy nor the moral injunctions of the Common Law —— which must be determined by a Jury duly informed of its right to Annulment.

Any judge or magistrate who fails to inform a Jury of its right to Annulment has stepped out of bounds and may be considered an Outlaw.

In this new dispensation there are many other categories of Outlaw. The reader is encouraged to spread this message and, with proper reasoning and evidence, propose such categories as they see fit. There is no need to quote the source of these reflections: on the contrary. The argument speaks for itself. The wording here may be adopted or adapted.

___________________________